Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRamos Acosta, Lizeth
dc.contributor.advisorCobo Ospina, Giselle
dc.contributor.authorPérez Clavijo, Isabella
dc.contributor.authorCastellanos Grisales, Cristian
dc.coverage.spatialTuluá, Valle del Cauca, Colombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T20:53:52Z
dc.date.available2025-08-19T20:53:52Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12993/5077
dc.descriptionilustraciones, gráficos, tablasspa
dc.description.abstractThis work addresses the glocalization of didactic materials for English language teaching, to value local culture in the educational context. This study was developed in the Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca with fifth-semester students of the Bachelor of Arts in Foreign Languages with an Emphasis on English. The identified problem lies in the limited integration of local cultural elements in the English educational resources, which reduces the students' connection with their environment and decreases the relevance of the learning process. To approach this situation, a questionnaire was designed and applied to students to identify their interests and significant cultural elements that could be incorporated into a glocalized didactic sequence. Subsequently, this sequence was implemented in the classroom, and data was collected through field diaries, in which the experiences, perceptions, and reactions of the participants during the process were documented. The information collected was subjected to a qualitative coding process, which made it possible to organize and categorize the data for deep analysis. The results show that the glocalization of materials not only favors students' recognition and appreciation of local culture but also contributes to increased motivation and participation in learning English. This study provides a viable proposal for cultural integration in language teaching, fostering more meaningful and contextualized learning.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsDedication / Acknowledgments / Abstract / Resumen / Introduction / Chapter I: Problem Statement / 1.1. Problem description / 1.2. Research Question / 1.3. Objectives / 1.3.1. General objective / 1.3.2. Specific objectives / 1.4. Rationale / Chapter II: Referential Framework / 2.1. Literature review / 2.1.1. International Background studies / 2.1.2. National Background Studies / 2.2. Theoretical framework / 2.2.1. From Globalization to Glocalization / 2.2.2. Glocalization of teaching materials / 2.2.3. Culture in foreign language learning / Chapter III: Methodological Design / 3.1. Research approach / 3.2. Research Design / 3.3. Research scope / 3.4. Population / 3.5. Data collection instruments / 3.5.1. Questionnaire / 3.5.2. Didactic Sequence / 3.5.3. Field Diary / 3.6. Data analysis instruments / 3.6.1. Data Analysis Grid / 3.7. Validation / 3.8. Data Analysis Process / Chapter IV: Results / 4.1. Questionnaire results / 4.2. Findings from the Didactic Sequence Implementation / 4.3. Results analysis / 4.3.1. Category 1: Cultural identity / 4.3.2. Category 2: Valuation of local culture / 4.3.3. Category 3: Cultural awareness in education / 4.3.4. Category 4: Impact of globalization on indigenous cultures / Chapter V: Discussion and conclusions / 5.1. Discussion / 5.1.1. Category 1: Cultural identity / 5.1.2. Category 2: Valuation of local culture / 5.1.3. Category 3: Cultural awareness in education / 5.1.4. Category 4: Impact of globalization on indigenous cultures / 5.2. Conclusions / 5.3. Recommendations / References /eng
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.extent115 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsDerechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.titleGlocalization of materials to value local culture in the development of English communicative competence in fifth-semester students of the Bachelor of Arts in Foreign Languages with Emphasis on English at Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaeng
dc.typebachelor thesisspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dcterms.audienceEstudiantesspa
dcterms.audienceDocentesspa
dcterms.audienceInvestigadoresspa
dcterms.audiencePúblico en generalspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.publisher.programLicenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias de la Educaciónspa
dc.type.localTesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregradospa
dc.description.degreenameLicenciado (a) en Lenguas Extranjeras con énfasis en Inglésspa
dc.description.degreelevelPregradospa
dc.identifier.instnameInstname:Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Unidad Central del Valle del Caucaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.uceva.edu.co/
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fspa
dc.rights.localAbierto (Texto Completo)spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.coverage.cityTuluáspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentEspecializaciónspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentMaestríaspa
dcterms.audience.professionaldevelopmentPregradospa
dc.relation.referencesAcuña, V. M. (2015). La codificación en el método de investigación de la grounded theory o teoría fundamentada.spa
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, M., & Lewis, P. (2023). Educational materials in a glocalized context.eng
dc.relation.referencesAppadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization.eng
dc.relation.referencesBanks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesBartra, R. (2020). Culturas híbridas y mercados globales: La invisibilidad editorial de las identidades periféricas.eng
dc.relation.referencesBlock, D. (2022). Post-truth and political discourse in language education. Multilingual Matters.eng
dc.relation.referencesBonk, R., Kefalaki, M., Rudolph, J., Diamantidaki, F., Munro, C., Karanicolas, S., Kontoleon, P., & Pogner, K. (2020). Pedagogy in the Time of Pandemic: From Localisation to Glocalisation.eng
dc.relation.referencesBorg, S. (2001). The research journal: A tool for promoting and understanding researcher development.eng
dc.relation.referencesBravo, R. (2017). La importancia de lo local en la educación contemporánea.spa
dc.relation.referencesByram, M. (2008). From foreign language education to education for intercultural citizenship: Essays and reflections.eng
dc.relation.referencesChambers, R. L. (2020). Reexaminando el papel de la cultura en la adquisición de segundas lenguas.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.eng
dc.relation.referencesClarken, R. H. (2012). Considering cultural factors in instructional design. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology.eng
dc.relation.referencesCortés, S., & You, D. (2023). Understanding the glocalization strategies implemented by McDonald’s in South Korea and Colombia in the past five years.spa
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.eng
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.eng
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, J. W. (2014). Investigación cualitativa y diseño de investigación: Selección entre cinco enfoques.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrystal, D. (2012). English as a global language (2nd ed.).eng
dc.relation.referencesDenzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research.eng
dc.relation.referencesEllis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesFang, X. (2011). Glocalizing ELT: From Chinglish to China English.eng
dc.relation.referencesFlowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes.eng
dc.relation.referencesFreire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, O., & Martinic, S. (1983). Language, culture, and education.eng
dc.relation.referencesGay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice.eng
dc.relation.referencesGiddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity.eng
dc.relation.referencesGiulianotti, R., & Robertson, R. (2022). Glocalization: A critical introduction in language teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, M. (2020). Desafíos de la educación global en un mundo localizado.spa
dc.relation.referencesGraddol, D. (2006). English Next. British Council.eng
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a ed.).spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta.spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J. (2022). A conceptual framework for developing a glocalized school-based curriculum.eng
dc.relation.referencesKemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). Cómo planificar la investigación-acción.spa
dc.relation.referencesKramsch, C. (2019). Language and culture in foreign language teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesKramsch, C. (2021). Teaching language along the cultural faultline.eng
dc.relation.referencesKramsch, C., & Vinall, K. (2021). The cultural politics of language textbooks in the era of globalization.eng
dc.relation.referencesKrashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.eng
dc.relation.referencesKumaravadivelu, B. (2018). Cultural globalization and language education.eng
dc.relation.referencesLusianov, J. (2020). Post-method era and glocalization in language teaching and learning.eng
dc.relation.referencesMahroum, S. (2021). Intercultural competence in the age of global mobility: New perspectives on cultural navigation.eng
dc.relation.referencesMartínez, A., & López, S. (2019). Comunidad y escuela: Una alianza para el aprendizaje significativo.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeddings, L., & Thornbury, S. (2009). Teaching unplugged: Dogme in English language teachingeng
dc.relation.referencesMiles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.eng
dc.relation.referencesMishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials.eng
dc.relation.referencesMoghaddam, M., & Tirnaz M. (2023). Representation of Intercultural Communicative Competence in ELT Textbooks: Global Vs. Local Values.eng
dc.relation.referencesMoher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.eng
dc.relation.referencesNieto, S. (2010). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities (10th ed.).eng
dc.relation.referencesNunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region.eng
dc.relation.referencesPatel, F., & Lynch, H. (2013). Glocalization as an alternative to internationalization in higher education: Embedding positive glocal learning perspectives.eng
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language.eng
dc.relation.referencesPennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2020). Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the Global South.eng
dc.relation.referencesRahim, H. (2018). Glocalisation of ELT cultural content: An analysis of English textbooks in Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam.eng
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, C. E. (1995). La Matriz Cultural: Una visión antropológica de la cultura mexicana.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, N. (2020). Percepciones sobre la interculturalidad (Estudio exploratorio con estudiantes y docentes de las Unidades Educativas José Manuel Belgrano 4, Juan XXIII 2 Y San Jorge 1).spa
dc.relation.referencesRavitch, D. (2016). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education.eng
dc.relation.referencesRichards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesRitzer, G., & Dean, P. (2019). Globalization: The essentials (2nd ed.).eng
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, R., & White, K. E. (2018). What is globalization? In G. Ritzer & W. Outhwaite (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.eng
dc.relation.referencesRobertson, R., & White, K. E. (2021). Glocalization: Critical reflections in language education.eng
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, J. M. (2021). La internacionalización de la educación superior: El inglés como lengua global en la formación universitaria.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlesinger, A. M. (1998). The disuniting of America: Reflections on a multicultural societyeng
dc.relation.referencesSteger, M. (2003). Globalization: A very short introduction.eng
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.eng
dc.relation.referencesStromquist, N. P. (2002). Education in a Globalized World: The Connectivity of Economic Power, Technology, and Knowledge.eng
dc.relation.referencesTaylor & Francis Online. (2024). Educational Studies.eng
dc.relation.referencesTESOL International Association. (2024). Standards for ESL/EFL teachers.eng
dc.relation.referencesTomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching.eng
dc.relation.referencesToprakcı, N., & Özaydınlı, B. (2020). Textbooks in English Language Teaching in view of globalization, localization, and glocalization.eng
dc.relation.referencesTorres, C. A. (2009). Education and Neoliberal Globalization.eng
dc.relation.referencesTurner, B. S. (2023). The Routledge international handbook of globalization studies.eng
dc.relation.referencesWalsh, C. (2005). La interculturalidad en la educación. Ministerio de Educación del Perú.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, X. (2021). Understanding the role of glocalization in foreign language acquisition: Evidence from Chinese EFL classrooms.eng
dc.relation.referencesWeninger, C., & Kiss, T. (2015). Análisis de libros de texto y materiales didácticos desde una perspectiva intercultural: Tendencias y temas.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillems, J., & Bossu, C. (2012). Equity considerations for open educational resources in the glocalization of education.eng
dc.relation.referencesWillis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning.eng
dc.relation.referencesWright, N. (2013). When east meets west: "Glocalizing" English-language teaching materials.eng
dc.relation.referencesZhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA.eng
dc.contributor.researchgroupEducación, sociedad e inclusiónspa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9035-1992spa
dc.contributor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-5435spa
dcterms.audience.redcolGrupos de investigaciónspa
dc.subject.keywordsTeaching materialseng
dc.subject.keywordsGlocalizationeng
dc.subject.keywordsLocal Cultureeng
dc.subject.keywordsCommunicative Competenceeng
dc.subject.keywordsEnglisheng
dc.description.abstractenglishThis work addresses the glocalization of didactic materials for English language teaching, to value local culture in the educational context. This study was developed in the Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca with fifth-semester students of the Bachelor of Arts in Foreign Languages with an Emphasis on English. The identified problem lies in the limited integration of local cultural elements in the English educational resources, which reduces the students' connection with their environment and decreases the relevance of the learning process. To approach this situation, a questionnaire was designed and applied to students to identify their interests and significant cultural elements that could be incorporated into a glocalized didactic sequence. Subsequently, this sequence was implemented in the classroom, and data was collected through field diaries, in which the experiences, perceptions, and reactions of the participants during the process were documented. The information collected was subjected to a qualitative coding process, which made it possible to organize and categorize the data for deep analysis. The results show that the glocalization of materials not only favors students' recognition and appreciation of local culture but also contributes to increased motivation and participation in learning English. This study provides a viable proposal for cultural integration in language teaching, fostering more meaningful and contextualized learning.eng
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000869546spa
dc.contributor.cvlachttps://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0001629826spa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Derechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Derechos reservados - Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca

Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca - Carrera 27A No. 48 - 144 - Tulua - Valle del Cauca - Colombia - Tel: +57 (60 2) 2242202 ext. 159 biblioteca@uceva.edu.co |  Contact Us


Sujeta a Inspeccion y Vigilancia por parte del Ministerio de Educacion Nacional

VIGILDADA MINEDUCACION